Henry James (1843-1916)
“An American Abroad”
Read the introduction to James in
the Norton Anthology of American
Literature or see the information at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_James
and http://www.henryjames.org.uk/home.htm.
Explore the characteristics of literary
Realism at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literary_realism
and http://www.wsu.edu/~campbelld/amlit/realism.htm.
Read James’ "The Art of Fiction"
(see http://guweb2.gonzaga.edu/faculty/campbell/engl462/artfiction.html). James wrote “The Art of Fiction”
in response to a series of lectures published later by the English critic
Walter Besant. James defends the novel
genre and likens it to history in that it represents life, though it does not
“reproduce” it. What are James’ ideas
about the intrusion of the author into the fictional narrative (omniscient
author interruptions of the narrative)?
Does he agree with Besant's advice that a novelist must write directly
from his or her experience? What
are James’ ideas about portraying life through “rose-colored window panes,” a
Romantic portrayal? What specifically is
the “province” of art? James calls the “germ”
or “seed” of a story the donnee, many times no more than a single moment
or image that is lodged in the poet’s mind to form the beginnings of a tale. What art form provides for James an analogy with
fiction? Read "The Real Thing" in the Norton Anthology of American Literature or
at http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/j/james/henry/j2r/.
How is
this story a dramatization of James' theory of fiction? Why are the Monarchs, who really are aristocrats,
despite the fact that they have fallen now into gentile poverty, unable to
portray “aristocratic characters” as models for the painter? Why is the cockney model, Miss Churm, more
than capable of doing so? What is James
trying to say about art reproducing and/or representing life. What is the missing ingredient that the
Monarchs don’t have that Miss Churm does have?
Read Daisy Miller in the Norton
Anthology of American Literature or at http://www.online-literature.com/henry_james/1100/. The setting for half of James’ novella is
HENRY JAMES (1843-1916, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_James),
The American, Portrait of a Lady, Daisy
Miller, The Golden Bowl, The Bostonians,
Washington Square, was one of the
premier 19th-century realists, differing from Twain and Howells in
that he was principally interested in psychological realism, in realistically
portraying inner truth of character. Note that his brother William James (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_James)
was a renowned American philosopher and psychologist) and Alice James, noted
diarist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_James).
James is one of the premier innovators in point of view and thus very influential on
Modernist writers. In striving for a
realistic narrative format, James achieves extraordinary objectivity by
allowing the story to unfold through a "center of intelligence,"
often a minor character who simply reports in the story what he observes (i.e.,
Daisy Miller). The author never
intrudes, is more or less objective, and the reader must then decide for himself what to think about
characters, theme, etc. James is
rather like an impressionist painter or a pointillist, who dabs paint upon
a canvas, creating a whole portrait that we can discern at a distance. Note Seurat’s
Sunday Afternoon . . .on the Grande Jatte
at http://cgfa.dotsrc.org/seurat/p-seurat1.htm.
THEME: Like Twain, James is
interested in portraying the shallowness of the “Gilded Age,” with its
nouveau riche, naive, sometimes ugly Americans.
He will often place his American characters in a European setting,
focusing on the contrast between European society (with its older
traditions, elegance, but often decaying morality) and American society
(with its honesty, individualism, energy, but sometimes naivety and
crassness). James disparages the
narrow-minded American Philistine—the
Babbitts, new moneyed, blissfully ignorant about
"The Art of
Fiction" (http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/j/james/henry/j2r/)
and "The Real Thing" (Norton Anthology of American Literature 1539).
How is “The
Real Thing” a dramatization of James' theory of fiction?
1. What do Mr. and Mrs. Monarch want of the
speaker, a painter?
Describe their
socio/economic status. Why can't
they get work? They are really
"the real thing"—a lady and a gentleman. Yet how do they fair as models, as “still life,” as “works of art” in for an art
series that the painter is planning?
(1542) At first, the painter
feels he will use the Monarchs for an illustrative series that he's trying to
negotiate a contract for, but as the work progresses he almost loses the
contract.
2. Are the Monarchs particularly deep,
complex people, albeit aristocratic?
4. Who is Miss Churm? (1539-40)
5. The Italian Oronte comes to work for
the painter as a servant--how does he fair as model?
6. By the story's end, the Monarchs (note the name) are "serving"
Oronte, serving the “servant”—as “reality,” or what we'd expect to be
reality, is turned topsy turvy. What
is the significance in terms of James’ aesthetic of "realism"?
Real life, or what we would expect to be real life, is
"serving" art, bending to art or
to the "alchemy of art" which can represent
life. The painter at last realizes that
the "real thing" is the "wrong thing"
for his art series (1548).
7. So what is the point of James' story—“The
Real Thing"?
What is the connection between this
story and "The Art of Fiction"?
James’
Aesthetic of Realism
James is telling us that both
fiction and painting “represent life” but do not precisely “reproduce it.” Art isn't life, though it certainly
reflects it. If a painting only
reproduced life, it would be what—photography? The Monarchs are the "real thing"
in life, but the "wrong thing" in art. Why are the Monarchs the "wrong
thing" in art; why do they not make what we call "art" as do
Miss Churm and Oronte? They are not
art because . . . they have no "white heat," as Emily Dickinson
wrote, no spirit, no fiery soul. Through her imagination—through "the alchemy
of art"—the artist touches the very core of a deeper reality (a Platonic
reality, as Poe would say). The artist's
imagination creates the illusion of "real life" (Oronte and
Churm)—and that illusion creates in us, the audience, what Coleridge would call
the "willing suspension of disbelief." Look at Andrew Wyeth’s The Patriot (American
Painting 61). How is this
“realistic” painting different from a photograph? Explore Wyeth’s art at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Wyeth,
http://www.brandywinemuseum.org/,
and http://pwp.netcabo.pt/jmmg/andrew_wyeth.htm.
Daisy Miller: American Expatriates and
Feminists?
Read Daisy Miller: A Study in the Norton Anthology of American Literature (1501)
or at http://www.online-literature.com/henry_james/1100/. The setting
for half of James’ novella is
Explore the status of woman during
the Victorian Age at http://www.victoriaspast.com/LifeofVictorianWoman/LifeofVictorianWoman.html. Investigate the New Woman, on the horizon during the last decade of the Nineteenth
Century and early decades of the Twentieth Century, at http://ehistory.osu.edu/osu/mmh/clash/default.htm.
Who
is Giovanelli? Who is Mrs. Walker? Daisy is a headstrong young woman, very
self-assured, and somewhat naïve, as are most of the nouveau riche Americans who travel in Europe at this time, but is her “fall,” as seen and described
through the eyes of the British and American expatriates and aristocrats in
Rome, fair? Why does Daisy visit the Colosseum at night? When
Winterbourne warns her that the place is rife with malaria after dark, she
answers “in a little strange tone”: “I don’t care” (36). What are the social undertones of this
story? Where do James’ sympathies
lie? How does the story fit into the framework
of Realism? Explain.